Microzooplankton (MZP) community dynamics under ocean acidification were studied through pH manipulated microcosm experiments conducted in the coastal waters of the Bay of Bengal (off Vishakhapatnam) during the months of July and October 2022 (Experiment 1 and Experiment 2). The total abundance of phytoplankton and microzooplankton (MZP) communities was varied from 3.66 × 104 to 5.27 × 105 Cells. L−1 and 0.06 × 103 to 1.53 × 103 Cells. L−1, respectively, and a significant difference in phytoplankton and MZP abundance was found between the initial and final day of the entire experimental samples (control and acidified). The initial seawater samples were dominated with centric diatom species Dactyliosolen fragilissimus (Experiment 1 and Experiment 2: 72–82%) and shifted to pennate diatoms such as Pseudo-nitzschia sp. (Experiment 1: 60–68%) and Amphora sp. (Experiment 2: 80–94%) at the end of the experiments (all acidified and control samples). The initial MZP community composition consisted of four different groups LC: loricate ciliates, ALC: aloricate ciliates (heterotrophy and mixotrophy), HDS: heterotrophic dinoflagellates and copepod nauplii, and at the end of the experiments, it was shifted entirely to the dominance of aloricate ciliates (16–73%) and heterotrophic dinoflagellates (67–100%) in all the samples (control and acidified) in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Statistical analysis (Spearman’s rank correlation) results showed a relative and significant inverse relation of MZP with phytoplankton biomass and abundance and heterotrophic bacterial counts in all the samples (control and acidified). Besides, the LC showed a weak correlation with Chl-a, and the HDS showed a significant correlation with LC, phytoplankton biomass and abundance, and bacterial counts (picocyanobacteria and heterotrophic bacteria). These results indicate that the MZP may graze on both picocyanobacteria and heterotrophic bacteria, and also, HDS may graze on their relative community like LC. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) revealed that prey abundance such as phytoplankton biomass (Chl-a), picocyanobacteria, and heterotrophic bacterial communities are most influencing variables on the MZP assemblages than other environmental variables such as pH, temperature, and salinity. Thus, these findings show that the MZP community dynamics under ocean acidification may vary with different species and groups due to their food availability (indirect effect) and individual competence (direct effect) to different environmental conditions, such as pH variations.
Subramanian S. E., Kumar B. S. K., Rao D. B. & Gupta G. V. M., 2025. Microzooplankton community dynamics under ocean acidification: key observations and insights. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 197: 598. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14017-2. Article.
