Seaweed farming is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR), offering the dual promise of climate mitigation and ecosystem enhancement. However, here we highlight a fundamental paradox: while macroalgae cultivation can significantly boost carbon sequestration and support biodiversity, it also introduces site-specific ecological risks—most notably eutrophication, hypoxia, and acidification—particularly in semi-enclosed coastal systems with limited water exchange. We synthesize current understanding of both the positive and negative impacts of large-scale macroalgae farming, examining pathways of carbon uptake, storage, and export alongside biogeochemical and food web disruptions. Critically, we identify the overlooked roles of hydrodynamic conditions and benthic-pelagic coupling in mediating ecological outcomes. To ensure that macroalgae aquaculture contributes effectively to climate goals while safeguarding coastal ecosystem resilience, we call for the development of a targeted and comprehensive evaluation framework capable of accurately assessing its impacts on adjacent waters. Such a framework should incorporate site-specific water-exchange characteristics and biogeochemical vulnerability, thereby enabling more informed and adaptive management strategies—including hydrodynamically guided site zoning—to support sustainable, long-term ecosystem benefits.
Wu Y., Liu Y. & Qi D., 2026. Reassessing the climate mitigation benefits and environmental risks of coastal seaweed farming. Discover Oceans 3: 37. doi: 10.1007/s44289-026-00144-2. Article.
0 Responses to “Reassessing the climate mitigation benefits and environmental risks of coastal seaweed farming”