The more you NOAA: what the Trump budget cuts mean for Maine’s oyster business

cages and cage tender

© Mook Sea Farm

RAY fellow Emily Okikawa chats with Bill Mook to talk about Mook Sea Farm, what cuts to NOAA would mean for his business and what the ocean means to him.

Bill Mook started Mook Sea Farm in 1985 after attending the University of Maine as an oceanography graduate student. Situated on the banks of the Damariscotta River in Maine, Mook Sea Farm grew American oysters for the half shell market and supplied seed clams, scallops and oysters to other East Coast shellfish farmers. Today, their hatchery produces only American oysters (more than 120 million juveniles annually). While they still sell oyster seed, market oyster sales now represent the greatest part of their business.

In addition to being a leader in the shellfish industry, Bill Mook is also a staunch water quality champion and a vocal advocate for ocean acidification mitigation strategies. Along with helping to form a citizen’s water quality monitoring group for the Damariscotta River (which eventually expanded to much of Maine’s coast), he’s also spearheaded several research projects that assess the impacts of ocean acidification on his shellfish business.

However, the federal agency that funds these important research projects, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is currently under threat. In February, the Trump Administration proposed over $1 billion in cuts to NOAA for fiscal year 2019, nearly 20% of the agencies entire operating budget. This would affect American businesses across the nation that, like Mook Sea Farm, rely on NOAA funding to support their livelihood.

I had a chance to speak with Bill Mook to talk about Mook Sea Farm, what cuts to NOAA would mean for his business and what the ocean means to him.

Emi Okikawa: What made you first aware of the effects of ocean acidification?

Bill Mook: In 2009, we were experiencing great difficulty growing our larvae. We lost a few batches, but mostly we observed that a cohort would suddenly stop feeding and we’d have to do series of water changes and coax them back to health.

Often times, instead of the normal 14 days to go through the larval cycle, it could take anywhere from 18 to 28 days. That put a big pinch on our production because when that happens a couple times, it represents an entire spawn which equates to a loss of 15 million oysters seeds.

We began to connect the dots to ocean acidification after meeting with some West Coast hatchery operators who described the problems they had experienced and how they figured out that they were caused by changing carbonate chemistry.

Okikawa: How is NOAA important to the work that you do?

Mook: NOAA provides information we use on a regular basis. Every morning when I wake up, I listen to the NOAA buoy reports and the NOAA weather forecast. Our business is very dependent on accurate weather information.
We also benefit from the Sea Grant programs, because they fund some of our research and development projects. I think that leads into what I see as the longer term of value of NOAA, which is helping us to understand some of the changes that we see taking place in our natural environment.
We appreciate NOAA funding work on ocean acidification. Through funded research, NOAA provides information that we’ll be able to use to plan our future and try to understand what changes we’re facing. NOAA is a very important part of getting all those answers.

Okikawa: Why was it important to you to come to Washington D.C. in March to meet with lawmakers and get to tell your story?

Mook: Well, the president’s budget proposed a one-billion-dollar cut to a five-billion-dollar budget. And given how important NOAA is to not just us, but everyone in the fisheries industry, we just thought that this was not a sustainable budget. It would really just gut key programs and leave us at a competitive disadvantage worldwide and really negatively impact our prospects for continuing to grow and improve our businesses. We believe that accurate information is key to our resiliency in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions.

In my case, coming from Maine, there is a very large and strong support for NOAA. Senator Angus King, Senator Susan Collins and Congresswoman Chellie Pingree are completely and totally on board. So, my goal coming down there was not so much to influence them to change their views or to impress upon them the importance of NOAA, but rather to provide them with stories that they could use to convince their colleagues to make sure that NOAA stays funded.

Emily Okikawa, Ocean Conservancy, 19 June 2018. Full article.

0 Responses to “The more you NOAA: what the Trump budget cuts mean for Maine’s oyster business”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.




Subscribe to the RSS feed

Powered by FeedBurner

Follow AnneMarin on Twitter

Blog Stats

  • 1,096,399 hits

OA-ICC HIGHLIGHTS

Ocean acidification in the IPCC AR5 WG II

OUP book